Maxon Cinebench 10 x64
Website: Cinebench
Maxon Cinebench is based on Maxon's popular animation software, Cinema 4D, which is used extensively by studios and production houses worldwide for 3D content creation. We've used the built-in CPU benchmark, which uses a 3D scene file to render a photo-realistic image of a concept bike. The scene makes use of various CPU-intensive features such as reflection, ambient occlusion, area lights and procedural shaders.
-
Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
-
AMD Phenom 9600 (4x2.3GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
-
AMD Phenom 9500 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
-
Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E8400 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E8200 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
-
AMD Athlon X2 6400+ (2x3.2GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
-
Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
-
AMD Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
-
Core 2 Duo E6550 (2x2.33GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E4500 (2x2.20GHz, 800MHz)
-
10671.0
-
9863.0
-
9192.0
-
8743.0
-
7566.0
-
7192.0
-
6624.0
-
6361.0
-
5902.0
-
5891.0
-
5615.0
-
5215.0
-
4808.0
Score
Cinebench is highly threaded in the xCPU test, so its no surprise that the quad core parts come out tops there, although, again the Wolfdale results are very favourable coming out trumps of the dual core parts.
-
Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E8400 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E8200 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
-
AMD Athlon X2 6400+ (2x3.2GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
-
AMD Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
-
Core 2 Duo Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6550 (2x2.33GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
-
AMD Phenom 9600 (4x2.3GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
-
Core 2 Duo E4500 (2x2.20GHz, 800MHz)
-
AMD Phenom 9500 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
-
3873.0
-
3669.0
-
3453.0
-
3287.0
-
3096.0
-
3079.0
-
3042.0
-
2846.0
-
2785.0
-
2715.0
-
2568.0
-
2499.0
-
2479.0
Score
In single CPU performance only the 3.0GHz E6850 splits the Wolfdales at the top of the table, and that's only because its 333MHz faster than the E8200 but only scores just under 200 points more - the same gap between the E6850 and same clocked E8400 above it.
Want to comment? Please log in.